Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-1
%
Narrower than or equal to national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM35%
Non-disadvantaged RWM36%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-1%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 35%Non: 36%
Nat gap: -18%
9%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 54%Non: 45%
Nat gap: -18%
-14%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 50%Non: 64%
Nat gap: -18%
3%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 58%Non: 55%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 0%
Nat: 100
101
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 101
Nat: 100
100
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 102
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 35% | 36% | -1% |
| Reading | 54% | 45% | 9% |
| Writing | 50% | 64% | -14% |
| Maths | 58% | 55% | 3% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Burnley Lowerhouse Junior