Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-26
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM43%
Non-disadvantaged RWM69%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-26%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 43%Non: 69%
Nat gap: -18%
-10%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 67%Non: 77%
Nat gap: -18%
-28%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 52%Non: 80%
Nat gap: -18%
-26%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 57%Non: 83%
5%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 6%
Nat: 100
101
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 104
Nat: 100
102
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 105
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 43% | 69% | -26% |
| Reading | 67% | 77% | -10% |
| Writing | 52% | 80% | -28% |
| Maths | 57% | 83% | -26% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 5% | 6% | -1% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Church Cowley St James Church of England