Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-40
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM40%
Non-disadvantaged RWM80%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-40%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 40%Non: 80%
Nat gap: -18%
-45%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 40%Non: 85%
Nat gap: -18%
-30%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 50%Non: 80%
Nat gap: -18%
-45%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 40%Non: 85%
10%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 5%
Nat: 100
107
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 109
Nat: 100
105
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 110
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 40% | 80% | -40% |
| Reading | 40% | 85% | -45% |
| Writing | 50% | 80% | -30% |
| Maths | 40% | 85% | -45% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 10% | 5% | 5% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →