Skip to content
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-11%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 54%Non: 65%
Nat gap: -18%
-3%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 62%Non: 65%
Nat gap: -18%
-7%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 69%Non: 76%
Nat gap: -18%
-14%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 62%Non: 76%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 12%
Nat: 100
102
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 104
Nat: 100
99
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 103
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
0%25%50%75%100%2022/232023/242024/2578%77%65%44%39%54%-34%-38%-11%Non-disadvantagedDisadvantaged
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
SubjectDisadvantagedNon-disadvantagedGap
RWM Combined54%65%-11%
Reading62%65%-3%
Writing69%76%-7%
Maths62%76%-14%
RWM Higher Standard0%12%-12%
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Disadvantage Gap — King's Lander Primary Academy | WhatSchool