Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
25
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM67%
Non-disadvantaged RWM42%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
25%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 67%Non: 42%
Nat gap: -18%
30%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 72%Non: 42%
Nat gap: -18%
19%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 69%Non: 50%
Nat gap: -18%
15%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 69%Non: 54%
3%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 4%
Nat: 100
103
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 99
Nat: 100
103
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 101
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 67% | 42% | 25% |
| Reading | 72% | 42% | 30% |
| Writing | 69% | 50% | 19% |
| Maths | 69% | 54% | 15% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 3% | 4% | -1% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →