Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
14
%
Narrower than or equal to national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM84%
Non-disadvantaged RWM70%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
14%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 84%Non: 70%
Nat gap: -18%
18%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 88%Non: 70%
Nat gap: -18%
18%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 92%Non: 74%
Nat gap: -18%
5%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 88%Non: 83%
16%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 17%
Nat: 100
107
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 106
Nat: 100
107
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 106
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 84% | 70% | 14% |
| Reading | 88% | 70% | 18% |
| Writing | 92% | 74% | 18% |
| Maths | 88% | 83% | 5% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 16% | 17% | -1% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →