Skip to content
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-16%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 52%Non: 68%
Nat gap: -18%
-24%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 63%Non: 87%
Nat gap: -18%
-20%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 67%Non: 87%
Nat gap: -18%
-8%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 63%Non: 71%
4%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 16%
Nat: 100
105
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 107
Nat: 100
104
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 105
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
0%25%50%75%100%2022/232023/242024/2569%65%68%33%33%52%-36%-32%-16%Non-disadvantagedDisadvantaged
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
SubjectDisadvantagedNon-disadvantagedGap
RWM Combined52%68%-16%
Reading63%87%-24%
Writing67%87%-20%
Maths63%71%-8%
RWM Higher Standard4%16%-12%
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Disadvantage Gap — Springdale Primary School | WhatSchool