Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-23
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM54%
Non-disadvantaged RWM77%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-23%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 54%Non: 77%
Nat gap: -18%
-16%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 66%Non: 82%
Nat gap: -18%
-25%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 60%Non: 85%
Nat gap: -18%
-18%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 72%Non: 90%
10%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 15%
Nat: 100
102
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 106
Nat: 100
103
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 107
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 54% | 77% | -23% |
| Reading | 66% | 82% | -16% |
| Writing | 60% | 85% | -25% |
| Maths | 72% | 90% | -18% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 10% | 15% | -5% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
St Francis de Sales Catholic Junior