Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
29
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM79%
Non-disadvantaged RWM50%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
29%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 79%Non: 50%
Nat gap: -18%
4%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 84%Non: 80%
Nat gap: -18%
-1%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 89%Non: 90%
Nat gap: -18%
29%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 79%Non: 50%
11%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 20%
Nat: 100
106
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 104
Nat: 100
104
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 103
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 79% | 50% | 29% |
| Reading | 84% | 80% | 4% |
| Writing | 89% | 90% | -1% |
| Maths | 79% | 50% | 29% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 11% | 20% | -9% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
St John and St James CofE