Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-50
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM44%
Non-disadvantaged RWM94%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-50%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 44%Non: 94%
Nat gap: -18%
-16%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 78%Non: 94%
Nat gap: -18%
-27%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 67%Non: 94%
Nat gap: -18%
-40%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 56%Non: 96%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 22%
Nat: 100
106
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 110
Nat: 100
100
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 110
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 44% | 94% | -50% |
| Reading | 78% | 94% | -16% |
| Writing | 67% | 94% | -27% |
| Maths | 56% | 96% | -40% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 22% | -22% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
St Margaret Clitherow Catholic