Skip to content
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-10%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 58%Non: 68%
Nat gap: -18%
5%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 77%Non: 72%
Nat gap: -18%
8%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 88%Non: 80%
Nat gap: -18%
-7%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 73%Non: 80%
12%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 8%
Nat: 100
103
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 105
Nat: 100
104
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 106
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
0%25%50%75%100%2022/232023/242024/2544%71%68%56%50%58%12%-21%-10%Non-disadvantagedDisadvantaged
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
SubjectDisadvantagedNon-disadvantagedGap
RWM Combined58%68%-10%
Reading77%72%5%
Writing88%80%8%
Maths73%80%-7%
RWM Higher Standard12%8%4%
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Disadvantage Gap — Linton Mead Primary School | WhatSchool