Skip to content
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-4%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 64%Non: 68%
Nat gap: -18%
-7%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 74%Non: 81%
Nat gap: -18%
-8%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 69%Non: 77%
Nat gap: -18%
-1%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 76%Non: 77%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 10%
Nat: 100
105
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 106
Nat: 100
105
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 106
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
0%25%50%75%100%2022/232023/242024/2586%76%68%42%54%64%-44%-22%-4%Non-disadvantagedDisadvantaged
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
SubjectDisadvantagedNon-disadvantagedGap
RWM Combined64%68%-4%
Reading74%81%-7%
Writing69%77%-8%
Maths76%77%-1%
RWM Higher Standard0%10%-10%
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Disadvantage Gap — Broomhill Junior School | WhatSchool