Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-35
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM50%
Non-disadvantaged RWM85%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-35%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 50%Non: 85%
Nat gap: -18%
-15%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 80%Non: 95%
Nat gap: -18%
-30%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 60%Non: 90%
Nat gap: -18%
-35%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 60%Non: 95%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 20%
Nat: 100
102
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 109
Nat: 100
100
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 107
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 50% | 85% | -35% |
| Reading | 80% | 95% | -15% |
| Writing | 60% | 90% | -30% |
| Maths | 60% | 95% | -35% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 20% | -20% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →