Skip to content
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-69%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 12%Non: 81%
Nat gap: -18%
-52%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 35%Non: 87%
Nat gap: -18%
-46%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 47%Non: 93%
Nat gap: -18%
-68%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 18%Non: 86%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 9%
Nat: 100
100
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 107
Nat: 100
94
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 105
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
0%25%50%75%100%2022/232023/242024/2575%77%81%55%69%12%-20%-8%-69%Non-disadvantagedDisadvantaged
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
SubjectDisadvantagedNon-disadvantagedGap
RWM Combined12%81%-69%
Reading35%87%-52%
Writing47%93%-46%
Maths18%86%-68%
RWM Higher Standard0%9%-9%
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Disadvantage Gap — Foxhills Junior School | WhatSchool