Skip to content
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-27%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 44%Non: 71%
Nat gap: -18%
-19%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 67%Non: 86%
Nat gap: -18%
-27%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 44%Non: 71%
Nat gap: -18%
-15%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 56%Non: 71%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 14%
Nat: 100
104
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 109
Nat: 100
101
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 108
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
0%25%50%75%100%2022/232023/242024/2560%42%71%39%13%44%-21%-29%-27%Non-disadvantagedDisadvantaged
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
SubjectDisadvantagedNon-disadvantagedGap
RWM Combined44%71%-27%
Reading67%86%-19%
Writing44%71%-27%
Maths56%71%-15%
RWM Higher Standard0%14%-14%
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Disadvantage Gap — Garden City Academy | WhatSchool