Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-27
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM46%
Non-disadvantaged RWM73%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-27%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 46%Non: 73%
Nat gap: -18%
-19%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 62%Non: 81%
Nat gap: -18%
-27%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 54%Non: 81%
Nat gap: -18%
-32%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 54%Non: 86%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 15%
Nat: 100
104
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 107
Nat: 100
99
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 107
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 46% | 73% | -27% |
| Reading | 62% | 81% | -19% |
| Writing | 54% | 81% | -27% |
| Maths | 54% | 86% | -32% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 15% | -15% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Garden Fields Junior Mixed and Infant