Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-23
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM37%
Non-disadvantaged RWM60%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-23%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 37%Non: 60%
Nat gap: -18%
-12%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 48%Non: 60%
Nat gap: -18%
-20%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 63%Non: 83%
Nat gap: -18%
-24%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 59%Non: 83%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 3%
Nat: 100
100
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 104
Nat: 100
101
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 106
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 37% | 60% | -23% |
| Reading | 48% | 60% | -12% |
| Writing | 63% | 83% | -20% |
| Maths | 59% | 83% | -24% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 3% | -3% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →