Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
12
%
Narrower than or equal to national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM25%
Non-disadvantaged RWM13%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
12%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 25%Non: 13%
Nat gap: -18%
-28%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 35%Non: 63%
Nat gap: -18%
5%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 55%Non: 50%
Nat gap: -18%
12%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 25%Non: 13%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 0%
Nat: 100
98
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 101
Nat: 100
93
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 94
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 25% | 13% | 12% |
| Reading | 35% | 63% | -28% |
| Writing | 55% | 50% | 5% |
| Maths | 25% | 13% | 12% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →