Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
16
%
Narrower than or equal to national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM80%
Non-disadvantaged RWM64%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
16%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 80%Non: 64%
Nat gap: -18%
16%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 87%Non: 71%
Nat gap: -18%
16%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 87%Non: 71%
Nat gap: -18%
9%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 80%Non: 71%
20%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 7%
Nat: 100
109
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 104
Nat: 100
110
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 104
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 80% | 64% | 16% |
| Reading | 87% | 71% | 16% |
| Writing | 87% | 71% | 16% |
| Maths | 80% | 71% | 9% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 20% | 7% | 13% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Mab Lane Junior Mixed and Infant