Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
32
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM75%
Non-disadvantaged RWM43%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
32%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 75%Non: 43%
Nat gap: -18%
17%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 88%Non: 71%
Nat gap: -18%
45%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 88%Non: 43%
Nat gap: -18%
43%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 100%Non: 57%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 0%
Nat: 100
106
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 103
Nat: 100
105
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 101
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 75% | 43% | 32% |
| Reading | 88% | 71% | 17% |
| Writing | 88% | 43% | 45% |
| Maths | 100% | 57% | 43% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
Peter Hills with St Mary's and St Paul's CofE