Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
9
%
Narrower than or equal to national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM95%
Non-disadvantaged RWM86%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
9%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 95%Non: 86%
Nat gap: -18%
11%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 97%Non: 86%
Nat gap: -18%
6%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 95%Non: 89%
Nat gap: -18%
8%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 97%Non: 89%
21%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 31%
Nat: 100
112
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 112
Nat: 100
110
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 111
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 95% | 86% | 9% |
| Reading | 97% | 86% | 11% |
| Writing | 95% | 89% | 6% |
| Maths | 97% | 89% | 8% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 21% | 31% | -10% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →