Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-32
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM54%
Non-disadvantaged RWM86%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-32%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 54%Non: 86%
Nat gap: -18%
-28%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 62%Non: 90%
Nat gap: -18%
-19%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 77%Non: 96%
Nat gap: -18%
-28%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 62%Non: 90%
8%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 15%
Nat: 100
105
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 109
Nat: 100
105
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 108
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 54% | 86% | -32% |
| Reading | 62% | 90% | -28% |
| Writing | 77% | 96% | -19% |
| Maths | 62% | 90% | -28% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 8% | 15% | -7% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →
St George's Catholic