Sample image
Disadvantage Gap
Disadvantage Gap Analysis
How outcomes compare for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
KS2 Disadvantage Gap
-32
%
Wider than national average gap
Disadvantaged RWM58%
Non-disadvantaged RWM90%
National gap-22%
Disadvantage Gap — Expected Standard
Percentage-point gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils meeting expected standard
Nat gap: -22%
-32%
RWM Combined Gap
Disadv: 58%Non: 90%
Nat gap: -18%
-21%
Reading Gap
Disadv: 74%Non: 95%
Nat gap: -18%
-32%
Writing Gap
Disadv: 58%Non: 90%
Nat gap: -18%
-16%
Maths Gap
Disadv: 74%Non: 90%
0%
Disadv. Higher Standard (RWM)
Non-disadv: 19%
Nat: 100
103
Disadv. Avg Reading Score
Non-disadv: 110
Nat: 100
103
Disadv. Avg Maths Score
Non-disadv: 109
Disadvantage Gap Trend
KS2 RWM Combined — disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged over 3 years
RWM Expected Standard
Disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged, 3-year trend
Detailed Comparison
Full breakdown of KS2 attainment by disadvantage status
| Subject | Disadvantaged | Non-disadvantaged | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWM Combined | 58% | 90% | -32% |
| Reading | 74% | 95% | -21% |
| Writing | 58% | 90% | -32% |
| Maths | 74% | 90% | -16% |
| RWM Higher Standard | 0% | 19% | -19% |
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last 6 years, or are children looked after by the local authority. Source: DfE School Performance Tables 2024/25.
Not sure which school is right?
Read our free guide to choosing the right primary or secondary school — what to look for, how to compare, and what Ofsted ratings really mean.
Read the guide →