

10leté trendy
Jak se Will Adams Academy změnila za poslední desetiletí
10leté historické trendy
Níže přepněte datové řady. Levá osa: Procento (%) • Pravá osa: Počet / Zápis
Data Insights
Comparing nationallyToggle metrics in the sidebar to plot them on the chart above. Active metrics are shown first below.
What this means: The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) teachers employed at the school. Part-time teachers are counted proportionally (e.g. a teacher working 3 days counts as 0.6 FTE).
Teacher numbers typically reflect the size and funding of the school. A school with 13 FTE teachers is relatively small. Changes over time may indicate growth, budget pressures, or restructuring.
What this means: The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) teaching assistants employed at the school, including higher-level teaching assistants (HLTAs).
Teaching assistant numbers vary widely between schools. The number of TAs usually depends on the school's SEN population, funding, and teaching model.
What this means: The pupil-to-teacher ratio (PTR) divides the total number of pupils by the number of FTE teachers. It indicates how many pupils each teacher is responsible for on average, though actual class sizes may differ.
A lower pupil-to-teacher ratio often indicates smaller class sizes, which usually allows for more individualised attention.
📊 📊 Will Adams Academy is ranked 20,307th out of 21,095 schools nationally
What this means: Teacher turnover rate shows the percentage of teachers who left the school during the academic year. This includes retirements, resignations, and transfers.
A turnover rate above 20% is typically considered high and may suggest recruitment challenges, workload pressures, or leadership changes.
📊 📊 Will Adams Academy is ranked 17,393rd out of 20,457 schools nationally
What this means: The teacher sickness absence rate shows the percentage of possible teaching days lost to sickness absence across all teachers during the academic year.
A teacher absence rate above 5% is higher than the national average and may indicate workforce wellbeing challenges or an above-average level of long-term sickness.
📊 📊 Will Adams Academy is ranked 3,935th out of 18,930 schools nationally
What this means: The average number of days lost to sickness absence per teacher during the academic year. This includes both short-term and long-term absences.
An average of more than 7 days per teacher is above the national average (typically around 5 days). This may be driven by one or two long-term absences.
📊 📊 Will Adams Academy is ranked 16,450th out of 18,919 schools nationally
What this means: The percentage of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals (FSM). FSM eligibility is widely used as a proxy indicator for socio-economic disadvantage.
An FSM rate above 30% is significantly above the national average and typically indicates a school serving a community with higher levels of deprivation.
What this means: The percentage of pupils identified as having Special Educational Needs (SEN), including both SEN Support and those with Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans.
An SEN rate above 20% is higher than the national average and may indicate strong SEN identification practices or a school that attracts families seeking good SEN provision.
📊 📊 Will Adams Academy is ranked 2,017th out of 22,081 schools nationally
What this means: The percentage of pupils receiving SEN Support — the first tier of SEN provision, where additional help is provided within the school without an EHC plan.
This level of SEN Support is above the national average. The proportion often reflects how the school identifies and categorises additional needs.
What this means: The percentage of pupils with an Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan — the highest level of SEN support, involving a legally binding document specifying the provision required.
This EHC rate is within the normal range. Many mainstream schools have 1–3% of pupils with EHC plans.
Rankings and contextual summaries are provided for informational purposes only and should not be taken as definitive judgements of school quality. Data is sourced from publicly available government datasets and may contain inaccuracies. School performance is influenced by many factors not captured in these metrics.
