Skip to content
Children in a school library

How to Choose a School

What parents typically prioritise — and what the evidence says actually matters.

There's often a gap between what parents instinctively focus on and what academic research says actually predicts good outcomes. This guide draws on survey data from the Youth Sport Trust, and research from the Sutton Trust, Education Policy Institute, and the Universities of Bristol and Cambridge.

Survey Data

What parents actually prioritise

Based on the Youth Sport Trust / Bupa Foundation survey of parents choosing secondary schools in England.

Pupil wellbeing

65% of parents

The top priority for secondary school parents. 68% of parents want more information from schools about how they support wellbeing.

Location & proximity

63% of parents

Location is the number one factor for primary parents. Only 39% of families choose their closest school — many bypass nearby options for better alternatives.

Facilities

60% of parents

Sports facilities, IT labs, and learning spaces. Parents often judge a school's quality by its physical environment.

Culture & ethos

57% of parents

The school's values, atmosphere, and community feel. Hard to measure from data alone — this is where a school visit matters most.

Ofsted rating

54% of parents

A strong influence, but typically ranked third behind location and wellbeing. Parents across all income levels respond positively to improved Ofsted ratings.

Exam results & attainment

52% of parents

Just over half of parents cite this as important. More affluent parents tend to prioritise academic outcomes more than disadvantaged families.

Academic Research

What the evidence says actually matters

Findings from peer-reviewed research and major education think tanks.

Progress scores, not raw results

EPI / DfE

Progress 8 (secondary) and KS2 progress scores (primary) measure how much value a school adds, regardless of intake. A school in a disadvantaged area with high progress scores is often doing a better job of teaching than a school with high raw results but low progress.

Teacher quality

Sutton Trust

The Sutton Trust identifies effective teaching as the single biggest in-school factor in improving pupil attainment. Teacher content knowledge and instructional strategies matter most — but this information is almost impossible for parents to assess before choosing.

Socioeconomic composition

Bristol / Sutton Trust

Research from the University of Bristol identifies a school's socioeconomic mix as one of the three strongest predictors of outcomes. The Sutton Trust's 'Selective Comprehensives' report shows top-performing schools have significantly fewer disadvantaged pupils, suggesting access inequality.

Attendance & engagement

DfE

DfE research shows pupils with no absence are 1.3 times more likely to achieve expected standards at KS2. Persistent absence (missing 10%+ sessions) has a clear, measurable impact on attainment. A school's attendance culture matters.

Ofsted is a limited signal

EPI / TES

Ofsted ratings account for only about 4% of the variation in student outcomes at age 16 (EPI). Schools with high proportions of disadvantaged pupils receive more negative judgements, even when their progress scores are strong. Read the full report, not just the grade.

The proximity trap

Cambridge / Sutton Trust

Over 80% of secondary schools use proximity as their oversubscription criterion. The Sutton Trust shows that wealthier families can afford housing near the best schools, creating 'geographic exclusion'. Proximity-driven choice entrenches inequality rather than challenging it.

The Gap

Comparing priorities with evidence

Where parents focus, what research says, and our practical takeaway.

FactorWhat parents sayWhat research saysOur verdict
WellbeingTop priority (65%)Important, but hard to measure from published data. Parent surveys and Ofsted's 'Personal Development' judgement are the best proxies.Trust your instincts — visit the school and talk to parents.
LocationSecond priority (63%)Proximity-driven choice favours wealthier families. Consider whether a slightly longer journey to a higher-progress school is worth it.Don't default to your nearest school without checking alternatives.
Ofsted ratingImportant (54%)Explains only ~4% of outcome variation. Schools serving disadvantaged communities get harsher grades relative to their actual progress.Read the full report. The headline grade alone tells you very little.
Exam resultsMatters (52%)Raw results mostly reflect intake, not teaching quality. Progress scores are a far better indicator of school effectiveness.Always check progress scores alongside headline results.
Teacher qualityRarely cited directlyThe single biggest in-school factor. Hard to assess, but staff turnover rates and Ofsted's teaching commentary can hint at this.Ask about staff retention and CPD when you visit.
Pupil mixRarely consideredOne of the three strongest predictors of outcomes. A more balanced intake generally correlates with better outcomes for all pupils.Look at FSM eligibility and compare to the local average.

The Bottom Line

What this means for you

Three practical takeaways from the research.

Look at progress, not headlines

The biggest blind spot

Most parents never check progress scores. A school with modest raw results but strong progress is often doing a better job of teaching than a school with headline-grabbing grades that simply reflect its affluent intake.

Your instincts matter too

Don't ignore them

Parents are right to care about wellbeing, ethos, and location — these things genuinely matter for a child's daily experience. The research adds to your instincts, it doesn't replace them.

Use data as a starting point

Then visit and ask questions

Use What School to compare progress scores, attendance, and pupil demographics alongside the factors you already care about. Data narrows your shortlist — then visit, observe, and trust your gut.

Sources

  • Youth Sport Trust & Bupa Foundation — “Well Schools” parental survey (2020)
  • Sutton Trust — “Selective Comprehensives 2024” and “School Choice and Social Mobility”
  • Education Policy Institute — “Annual Report on Education in England”
  • University of Bristol — “School Choice and Parental Preferences” (CMPO working papers)
  • University of Cambridge — “Does school choice help or hinder social mobility?”
  • Department for Education — KS2 and KS4 accountability methodology; Absence statistics

Bądź na bieżąco

Najnowsze informacje o wynikach szkół prosto na Twoją skrzynkę — praktyczne analizy dla rodziców.